Optical properties of solids
S. Sharma, K. Dewhurst, and A. Sanna
The ab-initio calculation of optical absorption spectra of nano-structures and solids is a formidable task.
The current state-of-the-art is based on many-body perturbation theory: one solves the Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE)
using the one-body Green's function obtained from the GW approximation. Resonances, corresponding to bound
electron-hole pairs called excitons, which have energies inside the gap, can then appear in the spectrum. This
procedure is a well-established method for yielding macroscopic dielectric tensors which are generally in good
agreement with experiment. Unfortunately, solving the BSE involves diagonalizing a large matrix making this method
computationally very expensive.
Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)[1], which extends density
functional theory into the time domain, is another method able, to determine neutral excitations of a system. Although
formally exact, the predictions of TDDFT are only as good as the approximation of the exchange-correlation (xc) kernel:
fxc(r,r',t-t') ≡ δvxc(r,t)/δρ(r',t') , where vxc is the TD
exchange-correlation potential and ρ is the TD density. There are several such approximate
kernels in existence, the earliest of which is the adiabatic local density approximation (ALDA) [2]. However in the dielectric function calculated using ALDA the physics of the bound
electron-hole pair is totally missing. There have been previous attempts to solve this problem, and there exist kernels
which correctly reproduce the peaks in the optical spectrum associated with bound excitons- The nano-quanta
kernel[3] derived from the
four-point Bethe-Salpeter kernel, is very accurate but has the drawback of being nearly as computationally demanding as
solving the BSE itself. The long-range correction (LRC) kernel has a particularly simple form, fxc = -α /q2, which limits its computational cost. This kernel produces the desired
excitonic peak, but depends on the choice of the parameter α which turns out to be strongly material-dependent, thereby
limiting the predictiveness of this approximation. In our latest work [4]
we propose a new parameter-free approximation for fxc, and demonstrate
that this kernel is nearly as accurate as BSE with a computational cost of ALDA.
The exact relationship between the dielectric function ε and the kernel fxc for a periodic solid can be written as
where v is the bare Coulomb potential, χ is the full response function, and χ0 is the response function
of the non-interacting Kohn-Sham system. All these quantities are matrices in the basis of reciprocal lattice vectors
G. The bootstrap kernel is a frequency-independent approximation given by:
where ε
-1(
q,ω = 0) is determined
self-consistently with
Eq. (1). We note that although Eq.(1) is exact, it is useful only when either
fxc or
ε is given; if neither are available then obviously it
cannot be used as a generating equation for both quantities. With the addition of the approximation given by Eq. (2)
however, both
fxc and
ε can be determined from
knowledge of
χ0 exclusively. The advantages of this form for the kernel is that
1. it has the correct 1/
q2 behavior; 2. as
ε
improves from cycle to cycle so does
fxc; 3. the computation cost is minimal and
4. most importantly, no system-dependent external parameter is required. Using the method the optical spectra for
various extended systems have been calculated using the Elk code
[5].

- Fig. 1: Imaginary part of the dielectric tensor (ε2) as as function of
photon energy (in eV).
Presented in Fig. 1 are the results for some small (Ge ∼ 0.67 eV) to medium (diamond ∼ 5.47 eV) bandgap
semiconductors. For comparison, experimental data as well as the RPA spectra are also plotted. The experimental data
clearly show that all these materials have weakly bound excitons leading to a small shifting of the spectral weight to
lower energies compared to RPA. The results from TDDFT with the new kernel exactly follow this trend and are in
excellent overall agreement with experiment.
A stringent test for any approximate xc-kernel is in its ability to treat materials with strongly bound excitons. In
these cases a new resonant peak appears in the bandgap itself and represents the bound state of an electron-hole pair.
Perhaps the most studied test case for this phenomenon is the ionic solid LiF. Other excitonic materials which have
also attracted attention and are considered particularly difficult to treat are the noble gas solids. Plotted in the
first column of Fig. 2 are the results for three materials of this class: LiF, solid Ar and Ne. What is immediately
clear is that the bootstrap procedure, which gave only a slight shift of spectral weight for Ge, now gives rise to an
entirely new bound excitonic peak inside the gap in all three cases. The location of the peak, which corresponds to the
excitonic binding energy, is also very well reproduced for all these materials.

- Fig. 2: Imaginary part of the dielectric tensor (ε2) as function of photon
energy (in eV).
The second column of Fig. 2 consists of some special cases - NiO has an anti-ferromagnetic ground state and provides
the bootstrap technique with a test of its validity for magnetic materials. It is clear from Fig. 2 that the bootstrap
method leads once again to the correct excitonic binding energy. Results for the anatase phase of TiO2 are
also presented in Fig. 2. TiO2 is a useful test for the bootstrap method due to its non-cubic unit cell,
which leads to directional anisotropy in the optical spectrum. As can be seen the bootstrap method captures this
anisotropy very well. Even subtle features like the small shoulder at ∼ 4 eV in the out-of-plane dielectric function,
which is missing in the in-plane case, are well reproduced.
To top
References
- [1]
- E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross. Phys. Rev. Lett., 52, 997, (1984).
- [2]
- E. K. U. Gross, F. J. Dobson, and M. Petersilka. Topics in Current Chemisty 181, 81,
(1996) (and references therein).
- [3]
- F. Sottile, V. Olevano, and L. Reining. Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 056402, (2003).
- [4]
- S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, A. Sanna, E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 186401 (2011).
- [5]
- http://elk.sourceforge.net/ (2004).
To top